Гл.страница| Каталог| Суды и сделки| Новости| Пресс-релизы| Комментарии| Статьи| Периодика| Вакансии| Резюме| Семинары| Форум

LAWFIRM.ru

Юридические форумы
 
Текущее время: 03 дек 2024 01:47

 




Начать новую тему Ответить на тему  [ Сообщений: 3 ] 
Автор Сообщение
 Заголовок сообщения: S CORPORATION - ?
СообщениеДобавлено: 15 апр 2009 12:58 
Не в сети
Senior Member
Senior Member
Аватара пользователя

Зарегистрирован: 13 апр 2007 10:31
Сообщ.: 436
S Corporation - что это такое по-русски и где об этом можно почитать поподробнее? Потерялся в особенностях исполнения налоговых обязательств партнерами

_________________
Вот через надцать эдак лет, когда иссякнут углеводороды, о чем будут вспоминать россияне на "Одноклассниках.Ру", вращая под столом динамо-агрегат на велоприводе?


Вернуться к началу
 Профиль  
 
 Заголовок сообщения: Re: S CORPORATION - ?
СообщениеДобавлено: 15 апр 2009 13:19 
Не в сети
Forum's God
Forum's God
Аватара пользователя

Зарегистрирован: 05 июл 2007 10:47
Сообщ.: 517
ну есть типа в US 2 формы чем-то аналогичные нашему АО (ну конечно со множеством-множеством отличий)- C и S corporation.
Основные отличия, насколько мне известно, что у S есть ограничения по обращению акций и то, что доход, полученный компанией не облагается у компании, а облагается подоходным налогом у акционеров.
Это то, что читала я. Может коллеги поправят.

И еще, по-русски почитать нету. Есть чуток по ихнему:
I continue to hear attorneys and other allegedly knowledgeable authorities recommending the use of Subchapter S corporations, when that ends up costing the clients a lot more in tax dollars. I guess it's time for another refresher on some of the big differences between normal C corporations and S. This is not intended as a claim that one size fits all in regard to business structure. There are times when an S corporation, or its newest corollary, Limited Liability Companies (LLCs) and Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs), is a good idea. I just think it is wrong to so quickly jump into such an arrangement without evaluating all of the consequences of doing so.

Tax Brackets
With our country's "progressive" tax rate structure, it is very expensive to have too much income on any one tax return. For individuals, the nominal rates go from 10% to 15%, 27%, 30%, 35% and 38.6% with actual effective rates much higher due to the phasing out of so many tax breaks as income increases. With an S corp, all of the corporation's income flows right onto the 1040 returns of the shareholders, pushing them up into higher tax brackets. A C corporation has its own progressive tax rate structure, ranging from 15% on the first $50,000 of net income, to as much as 39%. My philosophy is to look at the overall tax picture for individuals and their companies by smoothing income over the personal (1040) and corporate (1120) tax returns. For 2000, a married couple's 15% tax bracket ends at $43,850 of taxable income. It then jumps to 28%, almost double the rate. However, if you consider that the couple's C corporation has its own $50,000 15% bracket, their overall combined 15% bracket has more than doubled to $93,850. That alone can save several thousands of dollars per year in income taxes.

Income Taxed
With an S corp, the shareholders are required to pay income tax on their share of the corporation's income whether they take any money out of the corporate account or leave it in there. A few years ago, I wrote about the consulting client who had to include over $300,000 of S corp income on his 1040, when he had only taken out about $30,000. It wasn't bad enough that he had to pay more income tax than he had received, but things were much worse. He had a child support arrangement requiring him to pay 29% of his adjusted gross income (AGI) each year. This meant he had to pay 29% of the $300,000 to his ex-wife. It's not fair and I have never understood why child support is based on the parents' income rather than the actual cost to feed and clothe the kids; but that is how things are. If he had shifted all or part of his income into a C corporation, his child support would have been much less expensive.

More Deductions
As I have described elsewhere, the Section 179 expensing election is much more lucrative for owners of C corporations because they can literally multiply their total deduction by splitting their purchases of business assets among their different business entities (1040 Sole Proprietorships vs. 1120 Corporations). With an S corp, the Section 179 deduction is limited to just the one amount. Likewise, the deduction for net rental losses is magnified by using a C corp because it can use rental losses to offset all operating income. An S corp's rental losses are subject to the restrictive passive loss rules.

Attack On the Rich
As I have described on many occasions, "Mean Testing" (penalizing the evil rich) is a growing trend in this country, and is most often measured by the AGI on your 1040. People over certain thresholds lose tax breaks and have to pay in more taxes and penalties than others do. Income from an S corp will just make things worse. Income on a C corp will not be counted in most mean testing.

Fiscal Year
One of the most useful tools in the tax game arsenal is the ability to shift income between taxable years. Individuals report their taxable income based on the January 1 to December 31 calendar year. S corporations are required to also use the calendar fiscal year, allowing no opportunity to shift income between years. C corporations, however, can end their fiscal year at the end of any month. The first tax return will almost always be less than a full 12 months, so don't worry about coordinating it with the incorporation date. How this saves on taxes is pretty straight forward. Toward the end of your personal fiscal year (12/31), you bleed off some of your taxable income to your C corp by paying it for something like rent or marketing services. In January, your corporation can pay it back to you. Near the end of the corp's fiscal year, bleed its net profits out by paying yourself This back and forth income shifting can go on for a long time. Sometimes income is never taxed; or if it is, we make sure that it is taxed at the lowest rate possible (15%).

Employee Benefits
One of the benefits of a corporation is having it provide lucrative employee benefits that are deductible by the corp and tax free to the employees. Medical, life insurance, education, childcare, and retirement plans are just a few of the types of benefits available. I don't have space here to go over the rules for each type of plan. However, on a side by side comparison, the tax free status of some of these plans is much less generous for people owning more than 2% of S corporation stock.

For a side by side comparison of the availability of tax free fringe benefits, check out this chart from the Small Business QuickFinder.

Double Taxation
The biggest fear of c-corporations has to do with double taxation, where after-tax earnings are distributed to shareholders as non-deductible dividends. This is rarely a problem with small corporations because there are plenty of ways to pull money out of the corp in a manner that is deductible, and thus only taxed once.
Compensation - wages or consulting income
Interest Payments
Lease Payments
Royalty Payments
Contributions to Retirement Accounts

Remedying A Bad Situation
If you have an S corp that is hurting you more than it is helping you, how should you fix it? While this is something you definitely need to work on with your own tax advisor, I can give some general advice. First, I have seen a lot of people confused as to whether they even have an S corp or not. When you charter a corporation with your state, it is a normal C corporation. Until you file its first income tax return, the fiscal year is still changeable, even if you said something else on the SS-4 form you filed with IRS to obtain an identification number. You have to take the formal step of filing Form 2553 with IRS, signed by all of the shareholders, in order to become an S corporation.
Now, if you are an S-corporation, can you convert it to a C corporation? You can by filing a formal request with IRS, that carries the requirement that you cannot change back to an S corporation for at least five years. You will however be stuck with the December 31 fiscal year, nullifying any ability to use the income shifting tax saving strategy. IRS will not allow you to change your fiscal year because they know that will save you money and that is contrary to their purpose in life. What I have found is that it is much easier to just set up a brand new virgin corporation, especially in states like Arkansas and Missouri where it only costs $50 in filing fees. In states like California, where the filing fees are in the thousands, this strategy is a bit more expensive and needs to be evaluated a little more closely .

Addendum
Lately, I have been receiving a lot of feedback from various people around the country who have read this article, thanking me for pointing out things that other advisors have been ignorant of. One area of confusion still seems to be regarding exactly when a corporation becomes an S. Many people believe that the decision to be an S or a C is made at the time when the corporation is originally formed. That is not true. All corporations, when originally chartered by the State, are C corporations. Do nothing extra and it will remain a C corp.

However, to convert it to an S corporation, the shareholders must all sign and submit Form 2553 with the IRS to request that status. This can be done right away after the corp is originally chartered, or several years down the road. You need to be sure to watch the effective dates of the S election. Some States automatically accept the IRS's S election, while others require a separate form to be submitted to the State tax agency.

If a corp has been using a fiscal year that ends in a month other than December, it will have to change to a 12/31 fiscal year end if it changes to an S status. If the S status is later revoked, you will not be allowed to change from the 12/31 year end.

_________________
Там, где женщины танцуют, пляшут, они всегда вовлекают общество в какой-то благородный, созидательный, нежный процесс. (c) Е. Строев


Вернуться к началу
 Профиль  
 
 Заголовок сообщения: Re: S CORPORATION - ?
СообщениеДобавлено: 16 апр 2009 12:38 
Не в сети
Newbie
Newbie

Зарегистрирован: 16 июн 2007 09:23
Сообщ.: 21
Из моей выжимки по «The law of corporations in a nutshell» (для кан. минимума):

В 1957 году Конгресс США создал возможность выбора налогообложения для отдельных закрытых корпораций.
Этот выбор доступен корпорациям:
- имеющим менее 35 акционеров
- не ведущим деятельности за пределами штата инкорпорации;
- не являющимися частью группы аффилированных корпораций;
- у которых акционерами являются физические лица, сложные трасты или наследственная масса;
- не акционеров – нерезидентов;
- имеют только один класс акций.
Такие корпорации, именуемые корпорациями «S», имеют режим налогообложения, аналогичный режим налогообложения товариществ.


Вернуться к началу
 Профиль  
 


Показать сообщения за:  Поле сортировки  
Начать новую тему Ответить на тему  [ Сообщений: 3 ] 

 


Кто сейчас на конференции

Сейчас этот форум просматривают: нет зарегистрированных пользователей и гости: 26


Вы не можете начинать темы
Вы не можете отвечать на сообщения
Вы не можете редактировать свои сообщения
Вы не можете удалять свои сообщения
Вы не можете добавлять вложения

Найти:
Перейти:  

Гл.страница| Каталог| Новости| Пресс-релизы| Суды и сделки| Комментарии| Статьи| Семинары| Вакансии| Резюме| Периодика| Книги| Контакты!!!| Архив 2002-04|2005-06

   Rambler's Top100   Яндекс.Метрика   
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Русская поддержка phpBB